+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud Cover

  1. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud Cover

    I stumbled across a chemtrail website that looks like it could be the real thing. While the American chemtrail forums seem to have mostly tabloid, disinfo junk, this European chemtrail forum looks the way they are supposed to be.

    http://www.sciechimiche.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=715
    WEATHER MODIFICATION-Test Technology Symposium '97

    http://www.dtc.army.mil/tts/1997/proceed/abarnes/

    excerpt from forum post copy and paste:

    TTS '97 - Potential Weather Modification Capabilities AF 2025

    POTENTIAL WEATHER MODIFICATION CAPABILITIES AF 2025

    DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES
    Precipitation Enhancement
    Flood Lines of Communication
    Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness
    Decrease Comfort Level/Morale
    Storm Enhancement
    Deny Operations
    Precipitation Denial
    Deny Fresh Water
    Induce Drought
    Space Weather
    Disrupt Communications/Radar
    Disable/Destroy Space Assets
    Fog and Cloud Removal
    Deny Concealment
    Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce
    Detect Hostile Weather Activities


    ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES
    Precipitation Avoidance
    Maintain/Improve LOC
    Maintain Visibility
    Maintain Comfort Level/Morale
    Storm Modification
    Choose Battlespace Environment
    Space Weather
    Improve Communication Reliability
    Intercept Enemy Transmissions
    Revitalize Space Assets
    Fog and Cloud Generation
    Increase Concealment
    Fog and Cloud Removal
    Maintain Airfield Operations
    Enhance PGM Effectiveness
    Defend Against Enemy Capabilities


    Notes:
    ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
    “From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed” above.

    “Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.”

    The above table and quotes are from ‘Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,' Chapter 15, Volume 3, AF 2025
    ************************************************** ********* *


    SLIDE 3

    TTS '97 - Treaty Issues

    TREATY ISSUES

    The U. N. Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification, which went into effect 5 October 1978, applies only to “widespread, long-lasting or severe” environmental modifications.
    Local, non-permanent changes, such as precipitation enhancement, hail suppression
    Since 1978 the official Air Force position has been that weather modification had little utility or military payoff as a weapon of war.
    The official Air Force position needs to be reevaluated:
    In the light of 19 years of scientific advances
    In the light of advanced weapon systems which are more environmentally sensitive
    To prepare against technological surprise


    Previous slide Next slide Back to the first slide View Graphic Version

    Notes:
    ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
    Air University's SPACECAST 2020 contains a section on Counterforce Weather Control for force enhancement which identifies the necessary prerequisites

    “Atmospheric scientists have pursued terrestrial weather modification in earnest since the 1940s, but have made little progress because of scientific, legal, and social concerns, as well as certain controls at various government levels. Using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage, or injure another state are prohibited. However, space presents us with a new arena, technology provides new opportunities, and our conception of future capabilities compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic.”

    “The difficulty, cost, and risk of developing a weather control system for military applications are extremely high. However, the potential benefits for national security


    It appears the truth truly is out there. Maybe there are some real people out there who want to help figure out this chemtrail bullshit. We have to do this despite the chemtrail forums that are trying to keep us unaware of chemtrail realities.
    Last edited by Jeff Reynolds; 04-21-2007 at 01:10 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    People should check this shit out.
    This could be a smoking gun. I haven't seen this crap posted anywhere.















    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  3. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    So what did Colin Powell mean when he said the following?????

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2002/09/05/a1_5.php
    We are committed not just to rhetoric and to various goals, we are committed to a billion-dollar program to develop and deploy advanced technologies to mitigate greenhouse-gas emissions.
    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  4. Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Reynolds View Post
    So what did Colin Powell mean when he said the following?????

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2002/09/05/a1_5.php
    In 2002, the following report detailed the spending and the programs mentioned by Powell:

    "Between 1997 and 2000, the U.S. government appropriated $285.8 million to the Global Environment Facility (GEF). A significant portion of overall GEF financing has been dedicated to climate-
    related activities. It provided nearly $4.5 billion to multilateral institutions
    and programs, such as the United Nations and affiliated multilateral banks, to address climate change and related international development priorities. In addition, during the years 1997–2000 U.S. direct, bilateral, and regional assistance in support of climate change mitigation, adaptation, and crosscutting activities totaled $4.1 billion.
    Commercial sales for technologies that supported emissions mitigation and reduced vulnerability amounted to $3.6 billion. Over this same period, the United States leveraged $954.3 million in indirect financing through U.S. government-based financial instruments."

    http://www.gcrio.org/CAR2002/car2002ch7.pdf
    Read the 43 page path to resolving Climagate so that the world can move on:
    http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im...%20Scandal.pdf

  5. Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    7,779

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    Whatever is happening with you lamentable and pathetic Americans, people outside of the the hell you call home are coming together and will continue to do so, over the top of you.
    Let us deal gently with the truth. No more scaremongering: about nukes, about the climate, about terrorists, about anything.

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    We are committed not just to rhetoric and to various goals, we are committed to a billion-dollar program to develop and deploy advanced technologies to mitigate greenhouse-gas emissions.

    That's from Colin Powell. He's friggin admitting there is a deployment of advanced technolgoies to combat climate change. This is good proof that the military is involved with the chemtrailing/ weather modification.

    I'm not sure what Halvar spitted out, but maybe that's a Jehova's Witness kind of quirk.
    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    7,779

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    You can go on about the Jehovah's Witness stuff as much as you like. I couldn't give a fuck. And by the way your great Colin Powell quote is something I have known for years and assume is general knowledge among "chemmies".
    Let us deal gently with the truth. No more scaremongering: about nukes, about the climate, about terrorists, about anything.

  8. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

  10. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    near Boston, MA.
    Posts
    1,605

    Re: This has Nothing to Do with Commercial Airlines: Important Military links Admitting Involvement in Producing Fake Cloud C

    Quote Originally Posted by dewey189 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by may41970 View Post
    I'm so crazy that the only other person on this board I'm
    convinced is not being paid to post here is Jeff Reynolds.
    Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
    http://www.allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Debate Both Sides is hosted and maintained by Ottenhoff Consulting, LLC.