Rosie O'Donnell Replied to a Chemtrail Question

[Jeff Reynolds]

I took a chance and wrote to one of my favourite celebrities.

Posted by ro on April 26th at 9:07pm in ask ro
http://www.rosie.com/blog/sections/ask-ro/

socrates writes:

Have you ever seen chemtrails?
Paul Moyer of KNBC, L.A. has done two reports.
I am not wearing a tinfoil hat, just have questions
like u do with 9/11.

u should do a Donahue type show. UR for real. Love

(Rosie's response)
i never have
i have googled it

I just hope she googles the Paul Moyer stuff instead of just "chemtrails".
I'd hate, e.g., if she ends up reading about Visual Ray Wizard's abilities to dismantle chemtrails through his mind, or about the weatherfake threatening to sell his weather formula to the Chinese and Russians.

I am glad she posted my question. With her quitting The View, and with her blog being quite popular, this was a good time to get the word out about chemtrails. Just looking at how she is taking the non-tinfoil approach to 9/11 anomalies, I am hopeful that she will be able to do the same with this topic.

[weatherman714]

hahaha...

It's going to be a very active hurricane season this year, thanks to yours truly. Remember my goal this year. To knock out as much ng and oil production in the GOM as well as take hurricane target practice on the refineries around Houston to create gas shortages and make gasoline go go go up to $5-6/gal. That way it is a slam dunk for the Democrats in '08, because the GW community will be there screaming GW was responsible for these hurricanes... while little did they know it was from the same meteorologst that brought you Katrina and Wilma, the cold air snap Nov/Dec '05 that forced NG spot prices to $14+/contract, and the end of the most recent El Nino in a matter of 58 days all because the USAF screwed this meteorologist out of his snow on Dec 4,2006 and Dec 8,2006.... payback are a bitch aren't they?

[Jeff Reynolds]

hahaha...

It's going to be a very active hurricane season this year, thanks to yours truly. Remember my goal this year. To knock out as much ng and oil production in the GOM as well as take hurricane target practice on the refineries around Houston to create gas shortages and make gasoline go go go up to $5-6/gal. That way it is a slam dunk for the Democrats in '08, because the GW community will be there screaming GW was responsible for these hurricanes... while little did they know it was from the same meteorologst that brought you Katrina and Wilma, the cold air snap Nov/Dec '05 that forced NG spot prices to $14+/contract, and the end of the most recent El Nino in a matter of 58 days all because the USAF screwed this meteorologist out of his snow on Dec 4,2006 and Dec 8,2006.... payback are a bitch aren't they?

Whatever, you piece of shit disinfo agent. FUCK YOU

[halva]

Weatherman I'm sorry that I can't do anything finally about the attitude this fool has taken towards you. He is going to turn this place into Mav's, and will feel good about having done so.

[halva]

Weatherman should be kept on a tight leash, because he is erratic. His main qualification is being on "our side". But merely abusing him is no way of handling things.

[dewey189]

Weatherman should be kept on a tight leash, because he is erratic. His main qualification is being on "our side". But merely abusing him is no way of handling things.

He sounds nuts. Do you really want someone like that on your side?

[halva]

Does a person like you so full of American common sense want to be on our side?

[jayreynolds]

He sounds nuts. Do you really want someone like that on your side?

Wayne has been engrained with a "mob/cult" mentality. He is so insecure that he insanely craves any support whatsoever, no matter whether it helps him or hurts him. In reality, he is practically incapable of individual action, and only feels secure if he has company alongside him, bad company or not........

He has taken such nutjobs into his fold too many times to count, but Giacomm and Jim Phelps are pretty good examples:

Meet Jim Phelps:
http://debatebothsides.com/showthread.php?t=31432

Meet Gaiacomm:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=gaiacomm+haarp

[Jeff Reynolds]

He sounds nuts. Do you really want someone like that on your side?

This is typical of Halva. He wants to have the cake and eat it too. It is this type of irrationality that portrays chemtrails as kooky.

Posted by Halva:

Weatherman I'm sorry that I can't do anything finally about the attitude this fool has taken towards you. He is going to turn this place into Mav's, and will feel good about having done so.

Weatherman should be kept on a tight leash, because he is erratic. His main qualification is being on "our side". But merely abusing him is no way of handling things.

And Jay Reynolds actually made a good post here. When cousin Jay and myself put the chemtrails versus contrails debate to the side, we actually do have a few thoughts in common.

I am not the first "chemmie" to think about this concept of the "fake believer" or strawman. It just so happens that I entered the chemtrail forum fray around the time when the kooky believers started to take control of CTC.

Lord Jay, however, doesn't believe that most of these folks are fakes. He astroturfs that they are kooky and cultish. He does like to argue that Will Thomas is a hoaxster out to sell books. Yet, for the most part, Lord Jay avoids such an idea when it pertains to the common "chemmie". His wish is to portray anyone with questions about the skies as being naive or mentally ill.

I believe that the widescale fakery is part of the astroturfing. I believe that real people are being intimidated from posting on chemtrail forums. "They" wish to control both sides of every debate.

In their scheme, there are no such people like Dewey, who are not set in their positions and only wish to see honest presentations of both sides in a debate.

Even as much as a year ago, I was still openminded that there might not be a chemtrail program. The two main reasons I think there is one is because:

1) There seems to be this fake, astroturfing campaign of a fake debate between fake believers and fake debunkers.

2) I have tried to actually watch more closely the activities going on above. I have tried to see if perhaps there is some truth to what the debunkers have argued. What I have seen, however, is that when the "chemtrailing" takes place, it does not appear to be coming from normal aviation routes. I also started to notice how too often there is overcast. Now if there is only going to be one day a week of sun, now if when the weatherpeople are putting up icons for sunny days that still include clouds, I really start to scratch my noggin.

Let's just look at two views of chemtrails. One I believe is a spontaneous response to the reality above us, while the latter appears to be actual astroturfing.

1) Most people are too busy with their lives to notice the transformation from the aircraft emissions to the overcast white-out. Such aircraft appear to be deliberately up to something. I don't remember anything like this from before the last ten years. I do not remember there being so much friggin overcast so often. I don't recall aircraft ever producing such massive, fake cloud cover.

2) Chemtrails are contrails. Chemmies are either gullible or mentally ill. Just take a look at these contrails from airliners.net. Don't those look exactly like what are claimed to be chemtrails? We do not need to show a time lapse of these commercial contrails to show how they develop. Here are some WW2 bomber contrails. That's the ticket. That's the bottom line.

[Jeff Reynolds]

I will take this even one step further. Since scientists like David Travis have come out to argue that aircraft emissions are dimming our skies, the 1999 dinosaur debunker strategy is about to change dramatically. No longer will "chemmies" be argued to be suffering from "clouditis". The next line of disinfo will be that with global warming there is more evaporation into the skies, more moisture up there. Thus, with so much air traffic combining with African dust, Chinese aerosols, and global warming, this is why "normal contrails" are acting differently from in the past. The disinfo will be that chemtrails are not part of a deliberate program.

The problem with such an argument will be why has there been such a cover-up of chemtrails for ten years? There is some cliche that says something like a day late and a dollar short.